Every novel seems to work around one principle that no one truly sees as an issue, but as a hidden regret. Now all stories, whether confined to a three-hour film or a book with 500 pages, never mention this concealed truth, but then again, where there is no choice to be made or obstacle to be overcome, why should ink be spilled or light be cast? Unfortunately, unlike stories, reality never misses such details, especially when it comes to the needs of an individual versus the needs of an entire group.

Regrettably, bystanders are blinded by the cinematic notion that saving multiple lives holds greater weight than saving just one person, who probably will be forgotten. Theatrical as this idea is, it truly does define "majority wins," the voting process, and consequently, when you think about it, democracy as well. Who would have ever thought that such a movie-like concept could shape not only the governments of 192 countries but also our every decision regarding society’s needs? Usually, when an individual asks for something, they are met with suspicion. Instead, the provider asked decides to contribute to a proper system that has been certified, like a charitable organization, to ensure their good deed, rather than looking toward the needs of that particular individual. Clearly, in every situation like this, the needs of a group are given the upper hand, leading to severe unbalance and tension. As a witness of this injustice, I can assure you that my community definitely has encountered this issue.

It remains ironic that I made my personal judgment before the fate of the individual was even concluded, because, as stories go, that is a fine example of how much humans (the authors) give importance to the needs of a single being, compared to multiple people. In fact, when it comes to how the overall community addresses such a situation, or even combats it, the majority is always prioritized. Nevertheless, even after groups are victorious over individuals, at the end of the day the community, believe it or not, naturally resolves the tension. When it comes to a plural number of people, nothing remains constant, because like players in a chess board, they come and go. After all, every group and community is made up of different and unique individuals.